Maria Cristina Solé AgustÃ
University of Murcia, Spain
Title: Qualitative evaluation of the book of the nurse resident of family and community care (F & C) , by the teachers of the units of the UDM AF & C of Murcia
Biography
Biography: Maria Cristina Solé AgustÃ
Abstract
Introduction: Evaluation and formative feedback are fundamental components of any specialized training teaching program. The resident's book is an appropriate option for conducting formative assessments, particularly for a family and community nursing resident (RIA) whose training includes acquiring many competencies in different rotationsacross multiple disciplines and in multiple locations. However, the resident book evaluation system has limitations when applied in the current context, since it requires that the competences that must be acquired in each of the rotations be
well understood.
Objectives:To detect problems of the current book of the EIR of resident AFyC, and thus to be able to initiate a process to improve its quality and the evaluation of the EIR AFyC.( ínter al nurse resident of family and comunitaria care.)
Methodology: Study, descriptive, opinion, using the technique of key informants. Subjects; 24 professionals accredited for teaching (tutors), residents of EFyC, two teaching units, and their Health Care Centers. A self-report questionnaire with three open-ended questions was sent by email: What are the general problems of the current EIR Book? What are the training problems? What are the problems for the evaluation of the EIR? The data are presented in absolute figures and percentages on the total of responses.
Results: Of the teachers, to whom the survey was sent, they answered a total of 18. They obtained 42 answers to the first question, 31 to the second and 26 to the third question. In total 99 answers, which means an average of 5.5 responses per teacher. Of these, a total of 38 different answers were identified. Of the first question, they were delimited in 14 that correspond to; Competencies (24%), Writing language (19%), use and management (2%), completion time (12%), Repetitions (2%), Extension (2%), Complexity (2%), Competency evaluation (2%), Disawareness (2%), Adaptation to rotations (2%), Consistency with real and daily work (9), Laborious for Tutor (2%), Does not physically exist (2%), Book for Tutor (2%) Of the second question they were grouped in 15; Rotations (29%), Evaluation (6%), Complex and difficult to elaborate (6%), Short duration rotations (6%), Long time (6%), Resident Book Design (6), Little agile (3 %), Tasks (3%), Ignorance (10%), One load (3%), Language (13%), Many criteria (3%), Repetition (3%), Very long (3%), Access ( 3%) and in the third question in 9; Badly defined competences (33%), Extension (15%), Confusing (15%), Adaptation to nursing work (11%), Complex (8%), Difficult use (4%), language (11%), does not evaluate (3%), Procedure (4%).
Conclusion: The answers to the three questions are detected in the main field, the training needs about the resident's book and the comprehension difficulties of the competences of the resident's book. It is surprising that only 8% of the answers refer to the need to improve knowledge about the resident's book. These results can help detect problems in the current resident FYC EIR book and a process can be initiated to improve the quality of the resident's book and the evaluation of the AFyC EIR.
Keywords: Family and Community Care. Specialized Training in Nursing. Resident evaluation. Resident's book